|
Welcome,
Guest
|
|
TOPIC: altstep call with following statement body
altstep call with following statement body 10 Oct 2003 10:05 #6526
|
|
|
altstep call with following statement body 10 Oct 2003 10:12 #6527
|
|
|
altstep call with following statement body 10 Oct 2003 10:17 #6528
|
Hi,
The CR is accepted, the statement block in Jonah's example is allowed (on the agreed change list). Cheers, Gyorgy Original Message From: Wayne Elliott [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 12:13 PM To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Subject: Re: altstep call with following statement body Johan, I believe we (STS) raised a CR to address this issue, last year. Wayne Original Message From: Johan Nordin [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.] Sent: 10 October 2003 11:06 To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Subject: altstep call with following statement body Hello, Can anyone please remind me about the conclusion of the very lengthy discussion a couple of years ago regarding whether or not it should be allowed to use the following construct: Alt { [] MyAltstep() { // statement block ... } ... I think the standard is still unclear on this issue or have I missed something? Cheers, /Johan Tau Generation2 - Development Visualized. Productivity Realized. Learn more about Telelogic's new system and software development solution at: <www.taug2.com/> www.taug2.com Johan Nordin Technical specialist Telelogic Box 4128 SE-203 12 Malmö, Sweden Visiting Address: Kungsgatan 6 Tel: +46 703 05 25 27 Email: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. URL: <www.telelogic.com/> www.telelogic.com/ Telelogic - Putting you ahead in development!
Attachments:
|
|
|
altstep call with following statement body 10 Oct 2003 11:40 #6529
|
|
|
|
