Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: CR233

CR233 26 Nov 2003 14:00 #6597

CR 233 R2 Array definition in record set & union fields.doc
Anthony Wiles
ETSI Protocol and Testing Competence Centre (PTCC)
650, Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 87
Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 87
GSM: +33 (0)6 85 41 72 75
www.etsi.org/ptcc
Attachments:
The administrator has disabled public write access.

CR233 28 Nov 2003 07:35 #6598

Hello all,

just a minor issue: the allowed subtyping for arrays according to CR233 is just list subtyping, but not length restrictions. Whereas for types defined as record of length restrictions are also possible. I suggest that arrays can also be subtyped by restricting their length.

Best regards

Thomas

| Thomas Deiß, Nokia Research Center Street address: |
| P.O. Box 101823 Meesmannstrasse 103 |
| D-44718 Bochum, GERMANY D-44807 Bochum, GERMANY |
| Phone: +49 234 984 2217 (int. 8272217) |
| Fax: +49 234 984 3491 (int. 8273491) |
| E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |

Original Message
From: active_ttcn3 : mts stf133 ttcn version 3 - active members only [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]On Behalf Of ext Anthony Wiles
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:00 PM
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: CR233




<<CR 233 R2 Array definition in record set & union fields.doc>>
Anthony Wiles
ETSI Protocol and Testing Competence Centre (PTCC)
650, Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 87
Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 87
GSM: +33 (0)6 85 41 72 75
<www.etsi.org/ptcc> www.etsi.org/ptcc
The administrator has disabled public write access.

CR233 03 Dec 2003 15:58 #6599

There is one essential difference between record of and arrays. record = of are
unrestricted by default, array is always restricted by = declaration (u can not
declare an unlimited array).

Br, Gyorgy

Original Message
From: active_ttcn3 : mts stf133 ttcn version 3 - active members only =
[This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]On Behalf Of Thomas Deiss
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 8:36 AM
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: Re: CR233


Hello all,

just a minor issue: the allowed subtyping for arrays according to CR233 = is
just list subtyping, but not length restrictions. Whereas for types = defined as
record of length restrictions are also possible. I suggest = that arrays can
also be subtyped by restricting their length.

Best regards

Thomas

| Thomas Deiß, Nokia Research Center Street address: |
| P.O. Box 101823 Meesmannstrasse 103 |
| D-44718 Bochum, GERMANY D-44807 Bochum, GERMANY |
| Phone: +49 234 984 2217 (int. 8272217) |
| Fax: +49 234 984 3491 (int. 8273491) |
| E-mail: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. |

Original Message
From: active_ttcn3 : mts stf133 ttcn version 3 - active members only =
[This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]On Behalf Of ext Anthony Wiles
Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2003 3:00 PM
To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Subject: CR233




<<CR 233 R2 Array definition in record set & union fields.doc>>
Anthony Wiles
ETSI Protocol and Testing Competence Centre (PTCC) 650, Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex
FRANCE
Tel: +33 (0)4 92 94 43 87
Fax: +33 (0)4 92 38 52 87
GSM: +33 (0)6 85 41 72 75
<www.etsi.org/ptcc> www.etsi.org/ptcc
The administrator has disabled public write access.
  • Page:
  • 1

FacebookTwitterGoogle BookmarksRedditNewsvineTechnoratiLinkedin