Hi,
again:
I guess it is worthwhile to mention for everyone that the proper forum for TRI related questions is the TRI mailing list: "This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it."
Maybe ETSI could improve the guidance of people to that discussion list?
Moikka,
stephan
>
Original Message
> From: ext Hans Petter Moller [This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.]
> Sent: 21 March, 2003 13:45
> To: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
> Subject: tri interface in C
>
>
> Hello
>
> I'm looking into the "C" language tri interface "triMap" for
> the CommunicationSA.
> I have a question regarding the field BinaryString compInst
> Should the data field contain the name of the component instance
> or can we use a ptr to the component instance in this field.
> If we use a ptr, shall bits indicate the length of the ptr ?
>
> In the Java implementation getComonentId a string is used.
> But if a string is used why is it defined as a BinaryString in the C
> interface ?
>
> 6.3.2.3 TriComponentIdType
> TriComponentIdType is mapped to the following interface:
> // TRI IDL TriComponentIdType
> package org.etsi.ttcn.tri;
> public interface TriComponentId {
> public String getComponentId(); //*******
> public String getComponentTypeName();
> public TriPortIdList getPortList();
> public boolean equals(TriComponentId port);
> }
>
> Regards
> Hans Petter
>
